Skip to main content

Risk Register - Methodology

Purpose

The Risk Register defines how evaluated risks are formally recorded, tracked and maintained over time within Scheol Security Lab.

It acts as the governance and traceability layer of the risk management process.

Unlike Risk Modeling, it does not define how risks are evaluated, but how they are persisted, reviewed and followed up.


Role in the Security Model

The Risk Register is the operational output of the risk process.

It captures:

  • evaluated risks
  • their associated scenarios
  • their current treatment status
  • their evolution over time
  • their relationship with controls and validation activities

It ensures risks remain visible and reviewable after initial analysis.


Register Structure

Each risk is documented as a standalone Markdown file:

  • 'R-001.md'
  • 'R-002.md'
  • etc.

This supports:

  • versioning
  • traceability
  • review history
  • cross-referencing with scenarios and controls

Required Fields

Each risk entry must include:

FieldDescription
Risk IDUnique identifier
TitleClear risk description
Target Asset / CapabilityAffected asset or function
Related ScenarioLinked threat scenario
LikelihoodEvaluated likelihood
ImpactEvaluated impact
Risk LevelResult from risk matrix
Treatment DecisionAccept / Mitigate / Transfer / Avoid
Treatment RationaleJustification of decision
Owner / Review RoleResponsible role
Associated ControlsRelated security controls
Residual ConcernsRemaining gaps or uncertainty
Last ReviewLast update date
Next ReviewPlanned review date

Usage in Scheol

The Risk Register is used to:

  • track identified risks over time
  • support control implementation decisions
  • maintain visibility on residual exposure
  • provide traceability for validation activities
  • support structured review cycles

It is a living governance artefact, not a static inventory.


Relationship with Risk Modeling

Risk Modeling defines how risks are evaluated.

Risk Register defines how evaluated risks are stored and maintained.

Together they form a two-layer structure:

  • Modeling = analytical layer
  • Register = operational layer

Documentation Rules

  • Each risk must reference at least one scenario
  • Each risk must be linked to at least one asset or capability
  • Treatment decisions must be explicitly justified
  • Updates must be versioned when meaningful changes occur

Current Maturity

At the current stage, the Risk Register is partially established.

Established

  • file-based structure
  • naming convention (R-XXX)
  • linkage to scenarios and assets
  • basic lifecycle tracking logic

In Progress

  • consistency of treatment documentation
  • completeness across infrastructure domains
  • alignment with controls and validation outputs
  • improved review discipline

Planned

  • full population of all relevant risks
  • stronger integration with evidence and validation layers
  • improved audit-oriented traceability